recombinant ace2 protein (National Research Council Canada)
Structured Review

Recombinant Ace2 Protein, supplied by National Research Council Canada, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant ace2 protein/product/National Research Council Canada
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Autoantibodies targeting angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 are prevalent and not induced by SARS ‐ CoV ‐2 infection"
Article Title: Autoantibodies targeting angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 are prevalent and not induced by SARS ‐ CoV ‐2 infection
Journal: The FASEB Journal
doi: 10.1096/fj.202402694R
Figure Legend Snippet: Participant demographics and health characteristics.
Techniques Used: Infection, Biomarker Discovery
Figure Legend Snippet: Overview of ACE2 serology results and establishment of seropositivity thresholds. (A) Overall view of anti‐ACE2 IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies of the full cohort, including longitudinal sampling. (B) Quantitative Venn diagram representation of the distribution between IgM, IgA, and IgG ACE2 autoantibodies in the overall cohort of ACE2‐positive individuals. (C) IgG, IgA, and IgM anti‐ACE2 antibodies and associated threshold. IgG and IgA threshold was set at two cycles of 2 standard deviations (SD) from the mean of the presumed negative distribution. IgM threshold was set by a first cycle at 2SD and a second at 1SD from the mean of the presumed negative distribution.
Techniques Used: Sampling
Figure Legend Snippet: Influence of clinical features and demographic characteristics on ACE2 autoantibodies prevalence. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for demographic characteristics and clinical features for individuals in relation to (A) IgG, (B) IgA and (C) IgM ACE2 autoantibodies. A table with a complete list of OR and 95% CI is available in the Table . The OR (CI95) are shown here on a log10 formatted axis.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Persistence of autoantibodies in serum over time and association with previous SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. (A) Some individuals had one or two follow‐up samples. ACE2 IgG, IgA, IgM is shown longitudinally (Follow up 1 ( n = 120), median time between draws (SD) = 35 days (10), Follow up 2 ( n = 35), median time between draws (SD) = 37 days (6)). (B) IgG, IgA, and IgM ACE2 autoantibodies levels are shown for individuals who never had SARS‐CoV‐2 and for individuals who had serological markers of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and/or self‐reported a SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Unpaired two‐sided Wilcoxon test was used to establish statistical significance ( n = 464), p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.01 (**), p ≤ 0.001 (***), p ≤ 0.0001 (****).
Techniques Used: Infection
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of ACE2 autoantibodies on ACE2 enzymatic activity and SARS‐CoV‐2 spike‐ACE2 binding. (A) ACE2 autoantibodies levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) in a subset of samples for which ACE2 enzymatic activity was assessed. (B) Levels of ACE2 enzymatic activity in individuals who had IgG and/or IgA and/or IgM ACE2 autoantibodies in contrast to the individuals who had no detectable ACE2 autoantibodies. (C) Levels of ACE2 enzymatic activity in individuals who self‐reported a SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and/or had serological markers of previous infection. (D) ACE2 autoantibodies levels in a subset of samples in which ACE2 and spike interaction was assessed. (E) Anti‐Spike IgG antibodies levels pre‐ and post‐depletion in sera. (F) % inhibition representing the ability of the sera to inhibit spike and ACE2 interaction pre‐ and post‐depletion. (G) % inhibition representing the ability of the sera to inhibit spike and ACE2 interaction in individuals who had IgG and/or IgA and/or IgM ACE2 autoantibodies above threshold in contrast to the individuals who had no detectable ACE2 autoantibodies. (H) Linear correlation between the ability of sera to inhibit Spike and ACE2 binding and the levels of Spike IgG antibodies in depleted sera. Unpaired two‐sided Wilcoxon test was used to establish statistical significance where applicable, p ≤ 0.05 (*), p ≤ 0.01 (**), p ≤ 0.001 (***), p ≤ 0.0001 (****).
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Binding Assay, Infection, Inhibition
